The thought and shallow level of today's language mixed with the mediocre level of the linguists make me laugh when I read their books. I read 6 pages today of an article by someone who was looking for the etymology of the the albanian word *por.
It's moving the car in a circular direction wholly or partly around an axis or point. When you turn in the opposite direction it is 1/2 rotation. It is physical rotation of the object car. *Por is the same logogram concept turned into an ideogram in the word *por.
Knowing deeply the codes of Albanian, I can prove that it is the same concept abstracted from an logogram. It seems to break the linguistic rules for the smallest linguistic unit which has no logical meaning, a letter, but *por comes from:
Por>p o r>b o r
Some linguists, among them Eqrem Çabej, Kolec Topalli, Vladimir Orel have introduced it as a loanword from Latin *pero.
It seems clear that the two forms are etymologically related, but which word is borrowed. From their physical comparison "por"/"pero", the origin of the word *pero is the Albanian word *por, because it is one syllable. Monosyllabic words are known to exist earliest in time. It is the first scale that linguists should use in evaluating the form. The shortest form wins.
Knowing the language codes, I say that Latin borrowed it from the Albanian language.
*Por it is the word in a sentence that indicates the change of directions, the rotation of the sentence in another direction. The sentence is like a car traveling on a straight road. The right path is the thought connected in a certain subject-verb-object relationship which is what I call in a fugurative way its right path. An S-V-O sentence starts in one direction like a car that starts on a certain road but later can change that direction.
How to change direction on another road when your are driven. car? Taking a turn, right?
What is it linguistically?
It's moving the car in a circular direction wholly or partly around an axis or point. When you turn in the opposite direction it is 1/2 rotation. It is physical rotation of the object car. *Por is the same logogram concept turned into an ideogram in the word *por.
Knowing deeply the codes of Albanian, I can prove that it is the same concept abstracted from an logogram. It seems to break the linguistic rules for the smallest linguistic unit which has no logical meaning, a letter, but *por comes from:
Por>p o r>b o r
1) b>the ideogram of bej/do, make
2) o> o. The ideogram O
3) r-the ideogram of rotation.
The whole word means "do rotate O".
What is an O?
O is an linguistic object, an ideogram. It is an generalization of the concept we have today for the object. The word *object comes from the Albanian language
Object> O-bie-kt> O bej ket./O do this
The mathematic of the meaning of the word:
Object-bej(do)-ket(this)=O
Object is only the letter O.
When we physically rotate, a wheel for example, we change the direction of that thing, or we change the direction of the car, while with *por the ancient albanians used "roted the O" as a concept, similar of what we do with the wheel of the car, to changes the direction of the sentence to another direction.
For example: "I like music, *por I prefer to write about language". Only three letters, short and very precise.
For example: "I like music, *por I prefer to write about language". Only three letters, short and very precise.
The principle of codic construction like *or is everywhere in the Albanian language, it is one of its main codes and on the Europian languages as well.
Comments
Post a Comment