Linguistic glob

Something about thr negative prefixes.  For example, "lidh"= bind and "zglidh"=untie came for the same root in Albanian, and it is a very old concept. On the other hand, “Zglidh”=untie and “da”=divide are more or less the same concepts in Albanian. I cannot ‘n’daj” who is to blame= I cannot decide who is to blame. The both words can be used to explain the same meaning. Albanian has also this word formation for this group:  “Lidh”=bind the grain, “Lidh” =bind it it with a “litar”=rope, and “zglidh”=untie it. See the generative grammar of the words in the Albanian language, the same root for a words family like:  bind, untie, solve, rope.  The words have the same root. For untie concept it uses the negatives prefixes like zg’=s’ to form the opposite meaning of the same concept, but untie that means also solve a problem, used in an abstract context. Let’s analyze the Latin word “solve”. What is hidden on this word? I am dividing it in “S-o-lve”. The “S” in this case is

I would like to do some research for the words which are part of the human body, like the word "eyes". How many other meanings the "eyes" may produce? The Albanian word for "eye" is "sy" in standardized Albanian and "si" in a Tosk dialect. The Albanian words connected with the "eye" are the verbs such as " Une shoh = I see (Eng)" first form, " Une shikoj = I see" second form, " shih (imperative mood)”, etc. It is obviously a connection between English and Albanian for this group of words but this is not my point. My point is if you observe and study the function of the eyes, how the work together,  corresponding so closely as to be indistinguishable ,   correspondence in size, shape, and relative position on opposite sides of a dividing line (nose),  how they move; o perating at exactly the same time ,  in the same direction, spontaneous blinking which is done at same time, etc. Do the "eyes"