Skip to main content

The Big Mistake: Cadmus and the Myth of “Greek” Writing

 The Big Mistake: Cadmus and the Myth of “Greek” Writing

The Balkans did not lack writing.
The Illyrians did not vanish because they were illiterate.
They vanished because empire rewrote history.
And the Greeks—scholars, philologists, historians—helped do it.
They call it “Greek writing.” But the truth is written in myth itself: the first letters in Hellas were brought not by a Greek, but by Cadmus, a Phoenician exile. A foreigner. A stranger. A man whose alphabet traveled across the Eastern Mediterranean, sacred, formulaic, ritualistic, and utterly non-Greek.
If writing were truly Greek, why would the myth begin with a foreigner? Why would the alphabet arrive from the East, carried on the shoulders of an outsider, a wanderer, a man who slays dragons to plant seeds of civilization?

1. Cadmus Proves Writing Was Never Ethnic

Cadmus does not invent Greek writing.
He transmits it.
He does not found a Greek nation.He founds Thebes—a ritual-political, sacred city, not a Hellenic ethnic homeland.
Greek mythology itself confesses: letters came from Phoenicia, from the Levant, not from the Aegean. Any claim that “Greek writing” is ethnically Greek is already defeated by its own origin story.
Writing is ritual, sacred, administrative, and cosmologically authorized.
It is a tool of the priesthood, not a badge of blood.
It belongs to temples, not nations.

2. Thracians, Illyrians, and the Cadmean Alphabet

Thracians carved inscriptions in “Greek” letters. Illyrians would have, too, had the structures of empire preserved them.
If writing were ethnic:
Thracians would suddenly become Greeks in stone.
Their gods would vanish.
Their ancestors would dissolve.
None of this happens.
What happens instead is:
Native names survive.
Indigenous religious formulas persist.
A foreign script carries non-Greek meaning.
Cadmus’ dragon is slain, his teeth sown, and from them rise warriors. Writing is sacred violence, a tool of order and ritual, not proof of ethnicity. The Balkans were Cadmean from the start.

3. A Pantheocratic, Not National, Medium

The alphabet was not Greek.
It was Cadmean.It was shared across peoples: Greeks, Romans, Thracians, Illyrians, Anatolians, Levantines.
What united them?
Theocracy. Ritual. Cosmology. Sacred order.
Written language was:
Conservative
Formulaic
Resistant to the spoken tongue
Like Sanskrit, Latin, Arabic: it imposed ritual structure, not national identity.
Calling Cadmus’ alphabet “Greek” is like calling Latin “Italian”. It is a lie.

4. Why Illyrian Writing Disappeared

Writing survives where empires survive.
The Illyrians:
Were tribal, federative, decentralized
Resisted bureaucratic centralization
When priestly institutions collapse, writing vanishes—but language survives orally.
Albanian endures because it was never the language of temples.
It was the language of people.
Its survival is proof of resilience, not illiteracy.

5. Greek Appropriation: Theft in Scholarship

Later Greek scholars did what empire demanded:
Cadmus’ letters become “Greek”
Shared gods become “Greek gods”
Sacred myths become “Greek mythology”
The Balkans are rewritten as passive users.
Cadmus’ alphabet is nationalized. Sacred ritual becomes ethnic property.
This is not history. This is imperial narrative management.

6. The Truth the Academy Ignores

The ancient Mediterranean was not divided into nations.
Illyrians, Thracians, Hellenes, Epirotesians, Anatolians:
Spoke different languages
Shared sacred literacy
Participated in the same cosmology
An Illyrian inscription in “Greek” letters is no more Greek than a Slavic Bible in Church Slavonic is Byzantine.

Conclusion: Silence Is Erasure.

Cadmus, the Phoenician stranger, exposes the lie. Writing did not belong to Greeks.
Writing was shared, sacred, foreign-born.
The Illyrians did not disappear because they lacked letters.
They disappeared from the archives because empires renamed shared memory, confused writing with blood, and erased their story.
Albanian survives because it refused to be temple language.
It belongs to the people.
And that is precisely why it endures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Word creation. The "D" letter origin and the "D" pictogram rule of the word creation.

  In this article I will cover  the origin of the letter  D letter, and the pictogram concept of the word creation.  It was my first discovery of the word creation. In this blog I will give my discoveries, the rules of word creation of the European languages. Multiple theories exist as to how language first originated. Nobody is sure which one is true. Certified Translations Get Pricing Order Translation What is the Oldest Language in the World? There are over 7,000 languages in the world. Could there have been a time on the earth that we all spoke one language? If so, what is the oldest language in the world?  So what was the first language?  Discovering the first language that people spoke is difficult because so many languages died and were considered lost in history. However, ancient languages still survive until today; these languages may have been transformed a lot but their old origins may be traceable. Written languages existed but this does n...

Nephilim

N 'eh - Ph 'ih- L 'ee- M /  Nepheeleem Zacharia Sitchin (July 11, 1920 – October 9, 2010)  wrote the " Nephilim " (נְפִילִים) is derived from “nafàl" and means “fall". The term Nephilim occurs in Genesis 6:1-4, describing the point of time when three things began: men began to increase in number, came into existence the daughters of men , and the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. Is the "nephillim" really only a Hebrew word? That question is very subtle, however I think it has been more a limit of thinking for linguists rather than a serious argument. Let's begin first with the probable meaning the linguists think it is. We know that the " fall"  in every language means moving downward from a higher position involuntarily, usually by an accident, which maybe was the reason why Michael S. Heiser, PhD candidate, Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies , University of Wisconsin...

Total positional tolerance at material condition

Total positional tolerance at material condition (Hole) Suppose the Ø 1.005 / 1.010 hole is inspected and there are six parts with different ID dimensions. Their actual sizes checked with run out methods give that their actual axis is to be .006” over and up from the true position even though they have different actual ID’s. We want to know which part is within true position tolerance at MMC. Parts to be acceptable require some calculation when is used the run out method.             In GD&T, maximum material condition (MMC) refers to a hole that contains the greatest amount of material.             To understand and memorize simply and logically the concept, I suppose that you have a part designed as a square with one hole in the center, Ø 1.005 / 1.010 . You have produced just 5 parts and measured their holes. The hole of part #1 is on the low side of its tolerance Ø 1.005" and the hole of part #5 is on high sid...