Linguistic glob

Linguists that were and are trying to find out the origin of words have always been under the pressure of the confusion of their relative appearance, and mostly are being tricked by the actual performance meanings they have, which in fact are what we got at the end of the cycle. Linguists always belittle the study of their meanings which is really the primary thing that they are connected, and the relation between words and symbols what they stand for. Linguists haven’t seen other dimensions of the concept itself the words represent and the relationship between words and concepts. According to their views, started by Ferdinand de Saussure, who only demonstrated at his time the ignorance of linguistics, it is not very different from today views, after a century of how mistaken linguists views are, except Joseph Greenberg's and Derek Bickerton's views , there are mostly no connections between words and symbols what they stand for. A wrong orientation is going to create other w

N 'eh - Ph 'ih- L 'ee- M /  Nepheeleem Zacharia Sitchin (July 11, 1920 – October 9, 2010)  wrote the " Nephilim " (נְפִילִים) is derived from “nafàl" and means “fall". The term Nephilim occurs in Genesis 6:1-4, describing the point of time when three things began: men began to increase in number, came into existence the daughters of men , and the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. Is the "nephillim" really only a Hebrew word? That question is very subtle, however I think it has been more a limit of thinking for linguists rather than a serious argument. Let's begin first with the probable meaning the linguists think it is. We know that the " fall"  in every language means moving downward from a higher position involuntarily, usually by an accident, which maybe was the reason why Michael S. Heiser, PhD candidate, Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies , University of Wisconsin

The human language evolved from primitive communication to a language system. The evolution of language passed through several stages until it reached our modern expression of thought. The relation between stages is due to the fact that language started as a codification, or a reflection of the world outside us (Linguistic Universality). The continuity stands to the outside objects codified. Our receptors  eyes, nose, ears, mouth, received the input signals from environment and brains cells converted them  into a language signal. They were receiving the input information; the brain was creating ways to pass to a final output destination, which after a long time of developing the communication stage was the oral-acoustic organ. If there was no environment, there was no language going to be developed. After a certain time it was memorized to DNA and genes, however it is an infinite process, which it gradually gets partly memorized to the DNA and genes, and the rest is always in

It is very interesting how Albanian is used for creating new words, for example, the terms of the Medicine. “Vestibular-cochlear ” is created from four roots of Albanian: #1: * Vesh  is the Albanian word for ear. #2. * Bullar  is the Albanian word for a snake. *Bullar is a snake that likes to live inside the houses. In Albanian folklore, bullar was a no-venomous house snake that people used to have at home for cleaning it from rats. It was treated friendly like we treat today dogs. * Bullar was used also as a home guarder. In the south is still in use the fraise: “He sees as a bullar ”. Having a bullar in house was an auspicious sign as well. While " i bullar" is the possessive form, or the genitive of the noun * bullar . The / i / form is a grammatical category , when it is used before a noun, with the same function that / of / has in English. In this case the / i / is used for stating which something belongs to. In this case the * bullar " belongs to the

How humans made language is a very difficult question. Did they make all language hearing-imitating the sounds of everything in the nature which makes sound? Did human beings use their sounds for referring to water, animals, wind, storm, scratch, etc ? Or, they slowly created words for referring to the most important needs of their existence using many ways of words coding starting from the beginning of their conscious. I think, they probably made first words in this order: I. Water.(u) 1. River(lu) 2. Rein(shi) II. Food.(ug) 1. Hungry/saturated.(huhr)/? 2. Fruit available to them.(ho) 3. Eat. (ha) III. Dangerous/Safety.(lihg-z'ho) 1.Sun-moon/day-night.(o-n/o-t(ë)) 2. Animal predators of the human flash.(hau) 3. Fear.(bhr) IV. Protection/existence.(hon) 1. Tool/weapons: wood and stone.(hu-ghu) 2. Tree, cave.(ih-oh). 3. Make.(bho) 3. Run. (hihg) V. Reproduction/Sex.(ghi) 1. Woman-man.(go-gu) 2. Kid