Skip to main content

The Etymological Roots of "Spendere": A Journey Through Ancient Languages

The Etymological Roots of "Spendere": A Journey Through Ancient Languages
The word "spendere" has its foundation in the Geg Albanian language, specifically in the concept of the verb "ba" (make), which evolved to "ban" (made) into "bër" (made) in Tosk Albanian. 
To comprehend the essence of "spendere", we must venture beyond modern languages and delve into the primordial linguistical thoughts that shaped human understanding.
In ancient times, the concept of "spending" or "unmaking" emerged as a response to the production and consumption of resources. The Albanian language innovatively employed the concept of "çban" to convey spending, later transforming into the modern concept of expense. This evolution was rooted in the verb "bhan" (to make), highlighting the consumption and "unmaking" of agricultural production.
In a era preceding the existence of money, the concept of expense was born from the negative form of "bhon" (made), phonetically translated into "bhan", "bhen", and "pen". The Latin verb "produre" originated from "bho>bhon>bhan" and "bhër" in Tosk Albanian, where r>n, while the verb "dhon" transformed into "dhor>dhur>dhur>dur" (give). This etymological journey showcases the profound influence of Geg Albanian on Latin and the Albanian language.
The verb "prish" (destroy, break) further solidifies the connection between the Albanian language and the concept of expense. The root "sbër" (unmade) underscores the idea that destruction and breaking are intertwined with the concept of spending.

By exploring the embryomorphemes of the Albanian language, we uncover the ancient roots of "spender", revealing a rich tapestry of linguistical thought and philosophical insight. This journey illuminates the significance of understanding the historical development of languages and their profound influence on human understanding.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nephilim

N 'eh - Ph 'ih- L 'ee- M /  Nepheeleem Zacharia Sitchin (July 11, 1920 – October 9, 2010)  wrote the " Nephilim " (נְפִילִים) is derived from “nafàl" and means “fall". The term Nephilim occurs in Genesis 6:1-4, describing the point of time when three things began: men began to increase in number, came into existence the daughters of men , and the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. Is the "nephillim" really only a Hebrew word? That question is very subtle, however I think it has been more a limit of thinking for linguists rather than a serious argument. Let's begin first with the probable meaning the linguists think it is. We know that the " fall"  in every language means moving downward from a higher position involuntarily, usually by an accident, which maybe was the reason why Michael S. Heiser, PhD candidate, Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies , University of Wisconsin...

Word creation. The "D" letter origin and the "D" pictogram rule of the word creation.

  In this article I will cover  the origin of the letter  D letter, and the pictogram concept of the word creation.  It was my first discovery of the word creation. In this blog I will give my discoveries, the rules of word creation of the European languages. Multiple theories exist as to how language first originated. Nobody is sure which one is true. Certified Translations Get Pricing Order Translation What is the Oldest Language in the World? There are over 7,000 languages in the world. Could there have been a time on the earth that we all spoke one language? If so, what is the oldest language in the world?  So what was the first language?  Discovering the first language that people spoke is difficult because so many languages died and were considered lost in history. However, ancient languages still survive until today; these languages may have been transformed a lot but their old origins may be traceable. Written languages existed but this does n...

Total positional tolerance at material condition

Total positional tolerance at material condition (Hole) Suppose the Ø 1.005 / 1.010 hole is inspected and there are six parts with different ID dimensions. Their actual sizes checked with run out methods give that their actual axis is to be .006” over and up from the true position even though they have different actual ID’s. We want to know which part is within true position tolerance at MMC. Parts to be acceptable require some calculation when is used the run out method.             In GD&T, maximum material condition (MMC) refers to a hole that contains the greatest amount of material.             To understand and memorize simply and logically the concept, I suppose that you have a part designed as a square with one hole in the center, Ø 1.005 / 1.010 . You have produced just 5 parts and measured their holes. The hole of part #1 is on the low side of its tolerance Ø 1.005" and the hole of part #5 is on high sid...