Linguistic glob

From the very beginning of their existence human beings have had a memorized alphabet which was initiated from the previous animal stage and evolved and transmitted generation to generation through three parallel ways: the communication-oral way of the family-society language element, the instinctive language codes memorized into DNA and the mental-linguistic organ into brain, all always in a evolutionary development. They did never exist in one static level, or in a top high level. They has been developed from very lower levels to high levels. The Alphabet is not an invention. The written alphabet was a generalization of the memorizing accumulated spoken alphabet. The written alphabet was an evolutionary  result of alphabet-concepts started and carried from the time when humans were still unconscionable. There are many symbols of language that we are coming to understand in this blog as we understood how an “I” family works. A very important symbol is swastika. It was spread a

The language does not only consist of what we think, but it also has a huge impact of what we do and make. Thoughts consist of endless rotations between language elements in interaction. Unfortunately, their eventual level of links with their origin is on a tumor stage, when thoughts start to lose their vitality. Always, when that level goes on the verge is necessary a language renaissance, which came from "re"'new', "nai" 'one' and "zan"'make', which gives the meaning of 'make a new one'. Thoughts need to reflect the new social-physical world human beings are making and to do that the human beings need to understand better the ancient origins of thoughts. And, new thoughts are in a dual existence with new words. The origin of language is indispensable to be known , accepted and realized, otherwise the human beings will never be able to create new words, and to pass the endless neanderthals levels during evolution. Di

We know the number one is the first of numbers, but we do not understand why the number one is the first of numbers, or why it is in the beginning of numbers. We know the smallest natural number is 1, but we do not understand the why as well. The linguists’ habit of giving us definite conclusions has all kind of bad effects. The human language is being researched only from the point view of what we got so far, from the superficial side of language, not from that of its sources where thoughts came from. When the linguists' conclusions are accepted as a whole truth, not an accurate truth because there is eliminated the most important factor inside the language, it is compelled to build prejudices. Thus, when some linguists hold an opposite view, whose conclusions have the same importance as the accepted current conclusions, they are condemned to be heavily criticized, such as the Greenberg's mass comparison method, which is not accepted by the majority of linguists, to be m

What is Semantics? First of all, it is written the "semantic" as a term comes from X-language and has an X-meaning. It is also written as the first use, which is also a surprise because it was used very late in the history of writing. Today, most of semantics as a theory is based on the objectivists view that the physical world has nothing to do with the language concepts. That view is taken for granted as a being true that requires no proof. Building in that way the semantics based on what some linguists, or philosophers have interpreted some centuries ago, and giving the base meaning of words based on their views has also brought out the confusion of ideas on crucial questions in Semantics, the most important branch of linguistics. What is most highly abstract question to me is: Can something meaningless be given a meaning? For example, how could some meaningless "words" be given meaning in the first stage of the language evolution, and how humans m