Thoughts need to reflect the new social-physical world human beings are making and to do that the human beings need to understand better the ancient origins of thoughts. And, new thoughts are in a dual existence with new words. The origin of language is indispensable to be known , accepted and realized, otherwise the human beings will never be able to create new words, and to pass the endless neanderthals levels during evolution.
Discovering the origin of thoughts we will understand also the origins of their limitations depending on the other language elements that we have never considered them to be a part of language. The physical world as a part of language is very important. It will help us to interpret language.
 |
| How humans made language |
When did we start speaking the "I" ?
The earliest "I" family thought consisted of a logical value into human brain without having any sound.
Later it took on the"i" 'ee' sound constituted the first word. The "i" sound took on a thought structure which was formed in a previous evolutionary stage.
How did the sound for the "I" thought form?
That is a very difficult question. However, I think that it needs a research on the field of sound symbolism. I think the "i"'ee" sound probably was formed in imitation of a natural sound produced by small living species like insects, mouses, birds, snakes, etc. Probably an imitative sound produced by insects.
The "i" Sound and the "I" thought got a dual semantic values which is called word from linguists, and had already a pre-syntax to build new thoughts in combinations that contained the same principles.
How did the sound for the "I" thought form?
That is a very difficult question. However, I think that it needs a research on the field of sound symbolism. I think the "i"'ee" sound probably was formed in imitation of a natural sound produced by small living species like insects, mouses, birds, snakes, etc. Probably an imitative sound produced by insects.
The "i" Sound and the "I" thought got a dual semantic values which is called word from linguists, and had already a pre-syntax to build new thoughts in combinations that contained the same principles.
Based on the larger number of facts about the "I" family, we can generalize a formula.
The "I" had a logical value. It was a representation of every beginning of every concrete object of physical world. It was a logical value which has been codified for a very long time into the number one.
INIZI; INITI
I x I = I
where:
a). "n" means x 'multiply'
b) "z", "t" mean 'even'.
Translated into text: The "I" over the "I" is even with a beginning.
The main code is "I" which has the context of the word, and "n" and "z" are helping codifiers.
Translated into our modern linguistic terms they are:
I- a restricted quantifier of the "one" based only on just one common general logical value of all language elements. Example: the word "one"; Chinese:一'Yī' (yee)
n.-an unlimited helping quantifier of "one". Example: the word "any". Concept: Every other thing similar as this one we are talking about. Chinese:任何 'Rènhé'
 |
| Old European script, 6th to 5th millennia BCE. |
The Chinese word for some is 一些 'Yīxiē'. It is a very good visual summary of how the "I" (一, Yī) is incorporated into the concept for "some". From Chinese examples, we can see that Chinese characters represent the "I" family in a pretty significant way. Claims that Chinese characters do not represent the “semantic of a word” are baseless.
Probably for the "t" of "initi", the linguists may give arguments that it is a phonetic transformation because the prejudice tells us that English borrowed it from Latin, etc.
Before going to the phonetic transformation, which is overestimated too, I think we have to find out their semantic origin. It could be a phonetic transformation, but it could be also another way of codifying, which was developed with "t" helping code in English, pretty similar with the "z" code. They are too close like concepts. They differ only that the "t" gives a direction until to the end of the group of something, and the "z" which I have partly explained above.
On the other side, being a phonetic transformation does not mean that Old English did not have a pre-concept of that. According to the evidence of the "I" family English words, the Old English had already developed that family before the contact with French and Latin.
There are some key words of Albanian:
A. *menjëherë-key word .
Alb.*Menjiherë, *Menjëherë ‘immediately’
Semantic: right now, directly, without any delay; very quickly and without any time- interruption, without any time-space-object intervening, instantly
The Albanian words for ‘immediately” has three Albanian basic roots that have the capability of standing alone. Roots:
1. *me ‘the preposition with”
2. *nji, një ‘the number one’
3. *her(ë) ‘how often something happens within a particular period’
It is clear that the word “menjiherë” is created after the “one”, the “with”, and the “time” in the sense of “how often” in Albanian, It is formed through piecing together three older word-meanings to a new signification. Its meaning is clear: to give a number to the space-time-things as a part of a set of language elements: speakers, objects and their space-time relationship. I am going to separate *menjiherë: to the basic word of it, which is the word for one, and the helping words: * me and *herë.
So, Albanian word for "one" has passed to another “add signification stage” to mean something else using: me ‘the preposition with”+ nji (one) + here (often time). A new signification and a new compound word was made. At the present time, from the point of view of modern Albanian it sounds as it is based only on a time concept, when two language elements take place, which is not the true origin and that performance is what tricks us.
B.* ime-Gheg dialect (Elbasan city); Standart Albanian *tani. Other dialects: Tzam(Tosk) *tanja", Myzeqe *njashtithi,* imenthi, Midlle areas *tashti", Gheg1 *tash, Gheg2 *njitash
Roots:
1. *i 'pre-one', *nji,*nja, *një 'one'
2. *me 'with'
Semantic: In this moment, at the present time, now
Immediacy; immediate, immediately of English, which English generally borrowed from Latin words, but, however we do not know where they really come from, how did they develop, etc.
The meaning for *ime makes sense only understanding the relation between the specific sense of the old Albanian pre-one, the “i”, words for the number one *nja, *një, *nji and the “together” sense of the preposition *me , which when they are pieced together to “ime’, the new compound carried along both functions: “ give a number to the language elements in correlation with themselves”, which leads to a concept of 'now’. It is like to say today “with one”. In the concrete ambient, when a communication took place between a group of speakers into the physical world around them they give number to the time itself. So, the “now” means “number one of the time”, in a time-counting dimension on a realtionship with the four language elements. In this case the new signification of the new compound word is based to the time-position of the time element itself to the whole of the group of language elements. Language elements are considered mathematically like numbers, but having a concrete relationship as a complete object.
The same key-word has been used to: "prime" (primer), "prince", "primary", "prior", "priority", etc. They differ with "immediately" and "now" because they are related to a fixed position of language elements, a series of language elements codified as a mathematical string to a space concept, or both. The new signification came from using the same way adding another word which change the direction from time to space, or to time-space, the word "br", which I will explain later on.
The positions of language elements on the space are considered the same with the positions on the time. They are numbers.
| I_____niño a) Unity: niño In use:Spanish Word Origin: Unknown Word history: From Vulgar Latin: niñus Pronunciation: IPA: /ˈni.ɲo/ Noun : niño m (plural feminine niños singular niña, feminine plural niñas) 1. child, boy b) Merriam-Webster: niño Spanish, literally, the child (i.e., the Christ child); from the appearance of the flow at the Christmas season First Known Use: 1896 II______________________ SUMERIAN: ní-a: by itself ('self' + adverbial suffix). ní-ba: by itself ('self' + bi, 'its' + a). ní-bi (-a) : (by) itself ('self' + adverbial force suffix). III_______________________ a) Albanian Unities: bi, bej,bëj, bo, ba. Verb: 1. do, make b) Amerind Etymological Dictionary  |
Comments
Post a Comment