The Latin neuter sīgnŭm /ˈsiːɡ.nʊm/ (< earlier sīg-nom) is traditionally glossed as ‘sign, mark, token’. Classical Indo-European etymologies situate it within two principal derivational pathways:
- PIE sek- ‘to cut, divide’
→ semantic trajectory “cut, incision → mark”
→ Latin secāre ‘to cut’, segmentum - PIE sekʷ- ‘to follow, pursue’
→ semantic trajectory “follow → indicate → signify”
→ Latin sequor, consequi
Both reconstructions are formally plausible but exhibit nontrivial semantic discontinuities and fail to account for the internal morphological structure sīg- + -num.
1. Symbolic-Morphological Decomposition: (SY) + (G) Hypothesis
Under a symbolic philology framework, sīgnŭm may be decomposed into the symbolic root SY plus the object-marker consonant G, yielding a structure SY-G + -num → “that which the eye directs itself toward.”
The proposed symbolic root SY corresponds to Albanian sy /sy/ ‘eye’ < Proto-Albanian *su/*sü/*si (> PIE ḱsu-? or pre-IE symbolic substrate). Albanian preserves a reflexive cluster around sy/si/sh-, including:
- sy /sy/ ‘eye’
- shoh /ʃɔh/ ‘I see’
- shih /ʃih/ ‘be seen’
- shikoj /ʃiˈkɔj/ ‘to look, observe’
This cluster displays internal derivational coherence within Proto-Albanian (sh- as viewing agentive prefix + *ik/*ikʲ/ikʷ as directional/actional element).
1.1 Phonological Pathway: k > g
The transition from Albanian shik- /ʃik/ → Latin sīg- /siːɡ/ presupposes the voicing of k > g. This development is typologically common:
- PIE k > PGmc. g in voiced environments
- Latin intervocalic k > g is attested in symbolic and onomatological strata
- Proto-Albanian lenition of k → g in pre-Proto-Albanian substrate layers is documented in parallel lexemes
Thus shik- > sig- is phonologically defensible as a symbolic-morphemic adaptation rather than a regular sound correspondence.
2. Comparative Symbolic Cognate-Field
A visual-symbolic root SY/SI appears diffusely across Indo-European:
| Language | Form | IPA | Meaning | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albanian | sy | /sy/ | eye | Core symbolic root |
| Albanian | shikoj | /ʃiˈkɔj/ | look | Extended root shik- |
| English | see | /siː/ | see | PGmc. sehwan < pre-IE sy-? |
| German | sehen | /ˈzeː.ən/ | see | /s/ > /z/ voicing |
| Latin | similis | /ˈsɪ.mɪ.lɪs/ | similar | originally “seen-as-the-same” |
| Greek | σύμβολον | /ˈsym.bo.lon/ | symbol | secondarily reinterpreted through sym/syn but with sy- visual resonance |
| PIE? | ḱei-/ḱei̯- | — | notice, perceive | Potential Indo-Europeanization of symbolic sy- |
This constellation suggests not linear derivation but survival of a pan-substrate symbolic morpheme for visual perception.
3. Internal Albanian Evidence: shenja
Albanian shenjë /ˈʃɛɲə/ ‘sign, mark’ < Proto-Albanian *senja/sɛnja exhibits dual semantics:
- denotational marking (‘sign’)
- directional perception (‘that which draws the gaze’)
This duality parallels the proposed symbolic function of SY + G in signum.
The presence of sh- and sy elements within the same semantic domain strengthens the case that Albanian preserves archaic symbolic morphemes corresponding to pre-Indo-European semiotic structures.
4. Formal Symbolic Reconstruction of sīgnŭm
4.1 Reconstruction formula
SY (eye, gaze) + G (object-marker) + -num (Latin nominal suffix)
→ ‘that which is fixed by the gaze’
→ ‘sign, mark, indicator’
4.2 Phonological mapping
| Symbolic Unit | Proto-Alb. | Proto-form | Latin Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| SY /si, sy/ | su, si | si | sī- |
| G | g̟ | g | g |
| Actional suffix | -m/-n | -m̥/-nom | -num |
Combined: *si-g-nom → sīgnŭm
Note: the nasal element -nom is a productive neuter-forming suffix in Latin, matching dozens of abstract/result nouns (scrīptum, factum > fānum), strengthening formal plausibility.
5. Methodological Context
This reconstruction follows the symbolic-linguistic methodology articulated most explicitly by Petro Zheji (1960s–1990s), who argued that Indo-European lexicon contains relics of a pre-morphemic symbolic system consisting of monosyllabic semantic atoms (sy, va, ra, ka, etc.). Under this model:
- Albanian is unusually conservative
- Latin often preserves symbolic composites through partial phonological fossilization
- IE reconstructed roots may overlay or obscure earlier symbolic strata
Thus, signum may represent the Indo-Europeanized reflex of a much older symbolic compositional system, not derivable strictly through PIE sound laws but accessible via comparative symbolic philology.
6. Summary Formula
Proto-symbolic root: SY ‘eye, seeing’
Object-marker: G
Composite: SY-G = “that which is seen / that which directs the gaze”
Latin reflex: sīgnŭm = ‘sign, emblem, mark’Conclusion: The Albanian symbolic root sy/si provides a morpho-symbolic pathway more semantically continuous than the PIE sek-/sekʷ- derivations.
Comments
Post a Comment