Something about thr negative prefixes.
For example, "lidh"= bind and "zglidh"=untie came for the same root in Albanian, and it is a very old concept.
On the other hand, “Zglidh”=untie and “da”=divide are more or less the same concepts in Albanian. I cannot ‘n’daj” who is to blame= I cannot decide who is to blame. The both words can be used to explain the same meaning.
Albanian has also this word formation for this group:
On the other hand, “Zglidh”=untie and “da”=divide are more or less the same concepts in Albanian. I cannot ‘n’daj” who is to blame= I cannot decide who is to blame. The both words can be used to explain the same meaning.
Albanian has also this word formation for this group:
“Lidh”=bind the grain, “Lidh” =bind it it with a “litar”=rope, and “zglidh”=untie it.
See the generative grammar of the words in the Albanian language, the same root for a words family like:
See the generative grammar of the words in the Albanian language, the same root for a words family like:
bind, untie, solve, rope.
The words have the same root. For untie concept it uses the negatives prefixes like zg’=s’ to form the opposite meaning of the same concept, but untie that means also solve a problem, used in an abstract context.
Let’s analyze the Latin word “solve”. What is hidden on this word?
I am dividing it in “S-o-lve”.
The “S” in this case is a negative particle in a word, or called negative prefix, placed it in front of an idea —verb “lve” which I think it is phonetic transformation of a pre-Latin word, connected with the Albanian word “lidh”=tie.
The problem is that today only the Albanian language uses the “s” as a negative prefix to create the opposite meaning of a word. The rules of the negative word formation in Latin are completely different. Latin has negative prefixes: in, im, il, ir, a, an, anti, de, dis, dys, miss, non.
I am dividing it in “S-o-lve”.
The “S” in this case is a negative particle in a word, or called negative prefix, placed it in front of an idea —verb “lve” which I think it is phonetic transformation of a pre-Latin word, connected with the Albanian word “lidh”=tie.
The problem is that today only the Albanian language uses the “s” as a negative prefix to create the opposite meaning of a word. The rules of the negative word formation in Latin are completely different. Latin has negative prefixes: in, im, il, ir, a, an, anti, de, dis, dys, miss, non.
There is no “S” negative prefix in Latin. Some linguists say that it is a reduced form of "dis".
How is possible it is the most important negative prefix in Albanian? But it is just a "s" in the Albanian language and the Albanian language does not have any "dis, des, miss" negative prefixes.
Is it e pre-form of the negative prefixes of Latin?
On the other hand the “solve” werb does not have a "olve" form to undo its action using the negative prefix "s".
There are words in languages that have an opposing sense without using negative prefixes but from the evidence they are completely different such as "day" and "night". There was possible to form a "dis'day" word instead of the "night" word but ancient people did not form it that way.
Obviously "solve" is a pre-Latin word, remained in Latin from the previous mother language, and can be explained by an older language, the Albanian language which gives the origin of the Latin words in this case.
Comments
Post a Comment