Skip to main content

CMM Fixturing Measurement Techniques


Does CMM correct a bad fixturing of a workpiece?

Does CMM correct the impact that a bad fixturing has on GD&T's, lengths, diameters and angles ?

I think, the part fixturing and part alignment into the fixture is the main factor in CMM incorrect measurements. If we define the part fixturing and alignment incorrectly as a concept the CMM will be used incorrectly. 

If the CMM result of a trueposition of a feature to datum -A- is out of the tolerance can the CMM correct the true position if it the datum A is measured as a cylinder and the part is 3 degrees skewed from being parallel to the CMM axis. I never have assumed that the CMM corrects the errors of fixturing, and the part can be measured without a precise fixturing/alignment.

First question I will ask is what’s our benefit if the CMM does that?

We do not need a precise fixturing-alignment of the part into a fixture and consequently we save some time/cost on this.

Practically, how it is going to work when we measure parts on CMM and we see a red CMM result?

If we take for granted what we are being told that CMM corrects the errors of fixturing-alignment of the part, we need to know the answer of some very simple questions.

First, I would like to know how much error of fixturing in angles or .xxx” (in numbers) the CMM corrects? 

Secondly, the CMM corrects that for all kind of dimensions and all GD&T’s or only for some of them? 
As we know, there are 2-d and 3-d dimensions, simple features and sphere features, and the roundness is not the same as the perpendicularity, or the parallelism as the true position. The CMM may correct the perpendicularity, or parallelism when there are errors of fixturing but may not correct the fixturing errors for the the roundness or the true position of cylindrical features.

On the other end, if there is not an “error correcting” number, for example up to 3° from being parallel to Z axis, or .005” in Z direction, or a list of GD&T’s how can we accept assumption that CMM corrects the errors of fixturing?

When we use a CMM program how we are going to understand the borders that the CMM corrects or does not correct the errors of fixturing-alignment of the part and to react, to fix it in order to get e good measurement? 


We want to know that number with the simple purpose to apply that knowledge and having accuracy and precision in measurements.


What CMM does if the work piece is aligned wrongly  -0.2” in Z direction and 3° skewed from the Z axis?


Calypso knows the old position of the workpiece from the base alignment when is defined the workpiece alignment, when the coordinate system is established by probing physically the part, if you used the standard method to define the workpiece alignment, the 3 known steps of the part alignment, level-rotation-origin.

First time Calypso will scan the first feature of the base alignment according to the old data position. For example, if the first feature is a bore with the axis positioned perpendicular to Z axis, Calypso on the first time will touch only half of the bore and you can see how the probe will scan the air for the other half. After Calypso gets the new points Calypso will scan the same feature again, but this time correctly because the new features position now is recognized and being corrected. The old position is overwritten. So, Calypso corrects this kind of fixturing errors.

Practically, there will 
always be an error of fixturing, it does not matter what kind of base alignment you are using, automatic, or manual alignment or start alignment, Calypso will always correct the old alignment to a new alignment.

Calypso corrects the workpiece to a new position, but Calypso cannot correct that 3° angle of a bad fixturing. The angle will still be 3° to the CMM axis and it will have an impact, for example, on the roundness of a bore which could be as bad as .002” or more when the actual Roundness is .0003. 


Without a good fixturing it is not possible of forming datum planes or axes from their high point contact, right angle, distance, circular form, orientation, location, center axis of the feature. No good fixturing may form incorrectly datum frames. 
No good fixturing will also cause the probe measurements will not be taken enough perpendicular or parallel to the probe body which will produce errors and give results that are less repeatable and accurate.

Use always 3-jaws-clamping devices, vises, magnet and tall pins to set the part when it is being programmed on CMM. A good fixturing allows the datums to be repeatable.

From my experience a bad fixturing has a huge impact on GD&T's, a medium impact on lengths and diameters.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Robert Beekes failed on Pre-Greek

Robert Stephen Paul Beekes (Dutch: [ˈbeːkəs]; 2 September 1937 – 21 September 2017) was a Dutch linguist who was professor of comparative Indo-European linguistics at Leiden University and the author of many monographs on the Proto-Indo language. European. Robert Beekes also worked on Pre-Greek, the language he called non-Indo-European, spoken in Greece before Greek, according to him probably around 2000 BC. Since this language was not written, Beekes took his information from many words in classical Greek that show a non-Greek structure and development.  One of these words is *ἀδάμας , whose etymology I deduced in 2014 without reading his book.  I wrote in this blog: "Do linguists know that ἀδάμας – adámas of old Greek exists in today's Albanian in the form of "pa ndam"? When I read his book and these very words, I was stunned. How can a linguist of such a level not understand this word and its origin.  Beekes writes: "Adamas, hard metal? Diamond? Derived from...

Nephilim

N 'eh - Ph 'ih- L 'ee- M /  Nepheeleem Zacharia Sitchin (July 11, 1920 – October 9, 2010)  wrote the " Nephilim " (נְפִילִים) is derived from “nafàl" and means “fall". The term Nephilim occurs in Genesis 6:1-4, describing the point of time when three things began: men began to increase in number, came into existence the daughters of men , and the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. Is the "nephillim" really only a Hebrew word? That question is very subtle, however I think it has been more a limit of thinking for linguists rather than a serious argument. Let's begin first with the probable meaning the linguists think it is. We know that the " fall"  in every language means moving downward from a higher position involuntarily, usually by an accident, which maybe was the reason why Michael S. Heiser, PhD candidate, Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies , University of Wisconsin...

Word creation. The "D" letter origin and the "D" pictogram rule of the word creation.

  In this article I will cover  the origin of the letter  D letter, and the pictogram concept of the word creation.  It was my first discovery of the word creation. In this blog I will give my discoveries, the rules of word creation of the European languages. Multiple theories exist as to how language first originated. Nobody is sure which one is true. Certified Translations Get Pricing Order Translation What is the Oldest Language in the World? There are over 7,000 languages in the world. Could there have been a time on the earth that we all spoke one language? If so, what is the oldest language in the world?  So what was the first language?  Discovering the first language that people spoke is difficult because so many languages died and were considered lost in history. However, ancient languages still survive until today; these languages may have been transformed a lot but their old origins may be traceable. Written languages existed but this does n...