Linguistic glob

Linguists know magnificently most of the language, almost all of it, but they really understand very little how humans made it. My intention is to shake and question the linguistics doctrines, to challenge what I do not agree, and to break down some linguistics prejudices about how humans made language. I have written in this blog about the old Slavic word “oko” and the Latin word “ochio” which mean ‘eye’, on Friday, December 16, 2011, The Idiocy of the Linguistics. "/Oko/ is the Bulgarian word for eye, also in Czech, Polish, etc. /Ochio/ is the word for eye in Italian, which came from Latin /oculus/.  Has Latin borrowed that word from Slavic language or Slavic has borrowed from Latin ? The linguists tell us that /oko/ has nothing to do with /ochio/. The linguists have accepted that /oko/ comes from Proto-Slavic *oko, which comes from Proto-Indo-European *h₃ekʷ-. Are  /oko/  and /ochio/  not related? What do you think? They have the same meanin...

The word meanings are encoded in human brain by the non-living and living physical world content and its actions, included actions into the physical artificial world made by humans as a part of it. The complex relationships of the two physical world actions shaped first word meanings and with the language use of them by speaker-listeners in group affected concrete actions. Two processes were happening and took place simultaneously and they were in a space-time unity because the biological instinctive purpose to intend to achieve the surviving which created them does not logically have any priority to their space-time content. Speak to find a food and eat it. Speak when predators are coming and escape. It is like a breath: two very distinctive elements, the spoken sounds and the physically actions worked as a system for only one purpose. First human generations created meanings pressured by biological instinctive needs of food and surviving. What occurred in the words with their fir...

The whole of linguistics is pseudoscientific because it ignores semantics. For example, we can observe a very strange phenomenon. I'am going to make a simple list with words that I think their semantics are related. The list is: renew rebirth resurrection Etymologies: rebirth (n.)   1833, from  re-  +  birth  (n.). birth (n.)   early 13c., from a Scandinavian source, cf. O.N.  *byrðr  (replacing cognate O.E.  gebyrd  "birth, descent, race; offspring; nature; fate"), from P.Gmc.  *gaburthis  (cf. O.Fris.  berd , O.S.  giburd , Du.  geboorte , O.H.G.  giburt , Ger.  geburt , Goth.  gabaurþs ), from PIE *bhrto  pp. of root  *bher-  (1) "to carry; to bear children" (cf. Skt.  bhrtih  "a bringing, maintenance," L.  fors , gen.  fortis  "chance;" see bear  (v.)). Suffix  -th  is for "process" (as in...

Z-Semantic Meanings are shaped by physical world. Humans have formed their meanings based on the content of objects of physical world. A certain meaning is an unity of subjective-objective physicality of a certain object of physical world. Human beings built that inner-outer duality of physical world objects into symbols and memorized it gradually into brain. The process caused first an evolution of brain creating a proto-linguistic organ which passed to a very complex linguistic organ during 2-3 millions years of evolution. One of consequences of the linguistic organ evolution was the increase of brain. Linguists, philosophers, and scientists still are discussing that the mind and the brain are not the same. Using logical thinking, their relation is a tridimensional logical equation: M(mind)=L(language)=B(linguistic organ of brain) 1. You can not have a language if your brain does not have a linguistic organ. 2. If you do not have a language you can not think. ...