Toward a Theory of Geometric Iconicity in Albanian: Form, Sound, and Meaning in vesh ‘ear’

Toward a Theory of Geometric Iconicity in Albanian: Form, Sound, and Meaning in vesh ‘ear’

Abstract

This article proposes a research hypothesis concerning a possible relationship between visual form, phonetic structure, perception, and lexical meaning in Albanian. The hypothesis is developed through an analysis of the Albanian word vesh ‘ear’, whose phonological form /veʃ/ is examined alongside the visual configurations associated with its written representation  and the perceptual and anatomical properties of the referent.

The argument does not claim that the modern shapes of the letters v, s, and h constitute the historical source of the word vesh. Such a claim would confuse the history of writing with the history of the lexeme and would require independent historical evidence. Instead, the article proposes a broader concept, termed here geometric iconicity, referring to the possibility that spatial, visual, articulatory, and perceptual structures may participate in systematic correspondences between linguistic form and meaning.

The proposal is situated within the broader literature on linguistic iconicity, sound symbolism, and systematicity, which has challenged a strictly arbitrary model of the linguistic sign while retaining arbitrariness as a fundamental component of language. Existing research has demonstrated that non-arbitrary form–meaning correspondences may occur at phonetic, lexical, morphological, and multimodal levels.

The article therefore treats vesh not as proof of a geometric etymology, but as a case study from which a falsifiable research program can be developed. It concludes by proposing a corpus-based methodology through which the hypothesis could be tested against a larger inventory of Albanian lexical items.

Keywords: Albanian, iconicity, sound symbolism, phonosemantics, geometric iconicity, language and perception, etymology, phonology, semiotics

1. Introduction

The relationship between linguistic form and meaning has been one of the oldest questions in the study of language. One tradition emphasizes the conventional and largely arbitrary nature of the linguistic sign, while another has emphasized motivated relationships between form and meaning. Contemporary research increasingly treats these positions not as mutually exclusive alternatives but as interacting dimensions of linguistic structure.

Research on sound symbolism has demonstrated that linguistic sounds may be associated with perceptual dimensions such as size, shape, texture, and other semantic or sensory properties. Recent reviews describe sound symbolism as involving systematic associations between phonological form and properties of meaning, while experimental research has investigated such correspondences across languages and populations.

The present article asks whether this research tradition can be extended in a particular direction: can linguistic form be investigated simultaneously at visual, phonetic, articulatory, perceptual, and semantic levels?

The proposed concept is geometric iconicity.

The term is used cautiously. It does not imply that words were necessarily created by visually copying objects, nor that the shapes of modern alphabetic letters constitute the historical origins of lexical roots. Rather, it refers to a possible correspondence between:

spatial form → bodily articulation → acoustic form → perceptual experience → conceptual representation.

The Albanian word vesh ‘ear’ provides a useful preliminary case study because its referent is itself a perceptual organ, its lexical form contains several phonetic properties relevant to sound production and perception, and its written form permits a visual analysis.

The central research question is therefore:

Can recurring and statistically significant correspondences between geometric configuration, phonetic structure, perceptual properties, and lexical meaning be identified in Albanian?

The present paper does not claim to answer this question definitively. Its purpose is to formulate the hypothesis, establish conceptual safeguards, analyze a preliminary case, and propose a methodology by which the hypothesis can be tested.

2. From Arbitrariness to Iconicity

The traditional notion of the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign remains fundamental to linguistic theory. The existence of multiple languages with different forms for the same concepts provides strong evidence that lexical form cannot generally be derived directly from the physical properties of its referent.

However, arbitrariness does not entail that all relationships between linguistic form and meaning are arbitrary.

Research over recent decades has documented various forms of iconicity and sound symbolism. Iconicity may be understood broadly as a resemblance-based relationship between aspects of form and aspects of meaning. It can occur in spoken, written, and signed language and can operate at different linguistic levels.

Sound symbolism represents one important subtype. Experimental research has demonstrated associations between particular phonological configurations and perceptual categories such as roundness and angularity. More recent work has extended this research into natural lexicons and has investigated systematic distributions of phonemes across semantic categories.

This literature creates an important theoretical opening for the present proposal.

If linguistic form can exhibit motivated relationships with perceptual properties, then it becomes reasonable to ask whether these relationships might sometimes involve more than the acoustic signal alone.

The proposed model is therefore:

visual/spatial configuration

↓

articulatory configuration

↓

acoustic configuration

↓

perceptual configuration

↓

semantic representation

This model should not be interpreted as a universal mechanism of lexical formation. It is a research hypothesis concerning one possible source of motivation within lexical structure.

3. The Concept of Geometric Iconicity

The term geometric iconicity is introduced here as a working concept.

It refers to a possible relationship between linguistic signs and spatial or geometric properties such as:

opening and closure;

convergence and divergence;

curvature;

symmetry;

enclosure;

direction;

centrality;

contact;

separation;

movement toward or away from a point.

These properties may potentially interact with phonetic articulation because speech itself is a spatial and bodily activity.

For example, articulation involves:

movement of the lips;

movement of the tongue;

constriction of the vocal tract;

opening and closing of articulatory passages;

airflow;

vibration;

contact or near-contact between articulators.

Consequently, a geometric analysis of linguistic form should not be restricted to the visual shape of letters.

A more theoretically defensible model is:

geometric structure of perception ↔ geometric structure of articulation ↔ acoustic structure ↔ conceptual structure

Written symbols may constitute a later representational layer rather than the original source of the relationship.

This distinction is crucial.

4. The Case of Albanian vesh

The Albanian word vesh denotes the ear, the organ associated with hearing.

Phonologically, the word may be represented approximately as:

/veʃ/

Its structure therefore contains:

/v/ + /e/ + /ʃ/

The orthographic representation is:

where the digraph sh represents the phoneme /ʃ/.

The word therefore provides two different objects of analysis:

the phonological form /veʃ/;

the orthographic form .

They must not be conflated.

The phonological form is relevant to sound symbolism and articulation.

The orthographic form is relevant to the later visual representation of the word.

5. The Referent: The Geometry of the Ear

The external human ear presents a complex spatial structure.

Its visible morphology includes:

curved external contours;

folds and ridges;

concave and convex surfaces;

an opening leading toward the auditory canal;

a relatively complex arrangement around a central and internal space.

The ear is therefore not characterized by a simple geometric primitive such as a circle or triangle. Its defining visual characteristics are instead related to curvature, enclosure, opening, and internal channeling.

This observation provides the perceptual basis for the present hypothesis.

If a linguistic form associated with the ear repeatedly exhibits phonetic or visual properties corresponding to these perceptual characteristics, such correspondence could be investigated as a possible instance of iconic motivation.

The key word is correspondence rather than causation.

6. Graphic Structure: 

The orthographic form  permits a preliminary geometric analysis.

6.1. V

The graphic form V consists of two straight segments converging at a point.

Geometrically, it may be characterized by:

convergence;

angularity;

an opening;

directional orientation toward a vertex.

In a purely visual analogy, an open V-shaped structure may evoke the concept of a receptacle, channel, or convergent space.

Because the external ear contains an opening and directs sound toward an internal channel, a possible visual analogy can be proposed.

However, the analogy is not evidence of historical etymology.

The modern letter V belongs to a writing tradition whose historical development is distinct from the lexical history of Albanian vesh. Therefore, the graphic correspondence should be regarded as a synchronic visual observation, not as evidence that the letter shape generated the lexical root.

6.2. S

The letter S is characterized by curvature.

Unlike V, which is angular and convergent, S presents a continuous curved trajectory.

This is potentially relevant because the external ear is dominated by curved anatomical structures and folds.

The proposed correspondence is therefore:

V → convergence/opening

S → curvature

Again, this is an iconic interpretation, not an etymological claim.

6.3. H

The letter H contains two vertical strokes connected by a horizontal stroke.

Its basic geometric property is connection between two sides.

At a symbolic level, this may be interpreted as representing linkage, crossing, or connection.

Whether such interpretations have any linguistic relevance cannot be determined from the individual example alone.

7. Phonetic Structure

The phonetic level provides a more linguistically established basis for analysis than the visual shapes of letters.

7.1. /v/

The consonant /v/ is a voiced labiodental fricative.

Its articulation involves:

the lower lip;

the upper teeth;

a constricted airflow;

vocal-fold vibration.

Its production can therefore be described as:

contact/proximity → constriction → airflow → friction → voicing

The fact that /v/ is voiced is particularly interesting in a word whose referent is associated with hearing.

Nevertheless, there is no basis for claiming from this fact alone that /v/ historically represents the ear.

The appropriate formulation is:

The phonetic properties of /v/ provide a potential sound-symbolic association with a lexical item referring to auditory perception, but the existence and historical significance of such an association require independent testing.

8. The Phoneme /ʃ/

The final consonant of vesh is /ʃ/, represented orthographically by sh.

Like /s/, /ʃ/ is a voiceless fricative, characterized by turbulent airflow through a constriction.

This provides an acoustic component that is itself highly salient.

A simplified representation of the phonological structure is therefore:

/v/ → voiced frication

/e/ → vocalic nucleus

/ʃ/ → voiceless frication

The word consequently begins with a voiced fricative and ends with a voiceless fricative.

This creates a phonetic contrast:

voiced → vocalic → voiceless

Whether this internal organization carries semantic motivation is an empirical question.

9. Articulation and Perception

The most theoretically interesting aspect of the case may not be the letters themselves but the relationship between articulatory geometry and perceptual geometry.

Speech production is inherently spatial.

The speaker manipulates physical structures to create constrictions, openings, vibrations, and acoustic patterns.

The listener, meanwhile, reconstructs these acoustic patterns through auditory perception.

The referent ear occupies an unusual position in this system because it is simultaneously:

a bodily structure;

a perceptual organ;

an acoustic receiver;

a conceptual category;

the referent of a lexical form.

This creates a potentially rich environment for investigating whether linguistic representation can reflect aspects of bodily and perceptual experience.

The proposed chain can therefore be represented as:

body → articulation → sound → hearing → concept

rather than simply:

letter → object

This is a theoretically stronger formulation.

10. A Necessary Distinction: Synchronic and Diachronic Evidence

Any proposal concerning the “roots” of a word must distinguish between synchronic resemblance and diachronic origin.

A synchronic observation may establish that:

a word has a particular shape;

its sounds have particular articulatory properties;

its referent has particular perceptual properties;

speakers may perceive a relationship among these elements.

None of these observations establishes that the relationship caused the word to arise historically.

Diachronic etymology requires evidence from earlier linguistic stages.

Therefore, the following inference would be invalid:

The letter V resembles an opening → the word vesh means ear → therefore the letter V is the historical origin of vesh.

The present proposal makes no such inference.

Instead, it asks whether:

the same kinds of form–sound–meaning correspondences can be identified systematically across historically related lexical items.

That distinction protects the hypothesis from one of the most immediate objections it would face in historical linguistics.

11. The Double Form vesh

Albanian also provides an important semantic complication in the form of the word vesh, which functions both as the noun referring to the ear and as a verbal form associated with dressing or clothing.

The identity of the forms raises a separate historical question:

Are the two meanings historically connected, or are they etymologically unrelated forms that have converged phonologically and orthographically?

This issue should not be resolved through geometric speculation.

Instead, it should be investigated through:

historical Albanian sources;

dialectal evidence;

comparative Indo-European evidence where relevant;

earlier attestations;

morphological analysis.

Nevertheless, the coexistence of the two meanings is theoretically valuable because it provides a test case for distinguishing semantic association from formal identity.

12. From a Single Word to a Lexical System

A theory cannot be established from vesh alone.

The crucial question is whether comparable relationships occur systematically across Albanian.

Potential candidates include words referring to:

SY ‘eye’;

ZË ‘voice/sound’;

GOJË ‘mouth’;

DORË ‘hand’;

KOKË ‘head’;

DHËMB ‘tooth’;

HUNDË ‘nose’;

GJUHË ‘tongue’;

KËMBË ‘foot/leg’.

These words are particularly useful because body-part vocabulary represents a relatively concrete semantic domain and may permit comparisons between anatomical form, bodily function, articulation, and linguistic form.

The important methodological principle is that the analysis must be conducted blind to the desired result, as far as possible.

Otherwise, the researcher risks finding geometric patterns simply because human observers are exceptionally good at detecting patterns in ambiguous material.

13. A Testable Research Program

The geometric-iconicity hypothesis can be converted into a corpus-based research program.

13.1. Stage One: Corpus Construction

Construct a database of several hundred Albanian lexical items.

Each entry should contain:

lexical form;

phonological transcription;

grammatical category;

semantic field;

historical attestations;

dialectal variants;

proposed etymology;

orthographic history.

13.2. Stage Two: Geometric Coding

Visual properties should be converted into explicit variables rather than described impressionistically.

For example:

Property

Possible coding

Symmetry

0–1

Curvature

0–1

Angularity

0–1

Opening

0–1

Enclosure

0–1

Convergence

0–1

Divergence

0–1

Verticality

0–1

Horizontal connection

0–1

This would make the analysis reproducible.

Instead of saying:

“S looks like the curved part of the ear,”

the researcher could state:

“Words belonging to a defined anatomical category show a higher frequency of graphemes coded for curvature than expected under a specified null model.”

That is a testable claim.

14. Stage Three: Phonetic Coding

The phonological representation should likewise be coded according to measurable properties:

place of articulation;

manner of articulation;

voicing;

continuancy;

sonority;

vowel height;

vowel backness;

lip rounding;

articulatory movement.

The purpose would be to determine whether semantic categories correlate with particular phonetic features more strongly than would be expected by chance.

Such an approach is compatible with contemporary research on sound symbolism, which increasingly examines systematic distributions in actual lexicons rather than relying only on isolated iconic words.

15. Stage Four: Perceptual Coding

The semantic referents should also be coded.

For body-part vocabulary, relevant dimensions might include:

shape;

size;

curvature;

openness;

movement;

contact;

sensory function;

spatial orientation;

bodily location.

This produces a multimodal dataset:

phonetic properties × graphic properties × perceptual properties × semantic categories

The resulting matrix could then be analyzed statistically.

16. Stage Five: Statistical Testing

The central question would be whether observed correspondences exceed chance expectations.

Possible approaches include:

permutation tests;

logistic regression;

Bayesian hierarchical models;

clustering;

multidimensional scaling;

correspondence analysis.

A particularly important control would be comparison against randomized lexical forms.

For example, if researchers claim that words for curved body parts contain unusually many graphemes associated with curvature, the same procedure should be applied to randomly permuted lexical forms.

The hypothesis should survive this control.

Otherwise, the apparent pattern may simply reflect the frequency distribution of letters in Albanian.

17. Historical Control

Statistical association alone would still not establish etymology.

Historical evidence must therefore be incorporated as an independent layer.

For each candidate word, researchers should determine:

the earliest available attestations;

historical spelling;

dialectal forms;

reconstructed forms;

cognates in related languages;

possible borrowing;

documented semantic change.

This permits an essential distinction:

Type A: Historical iconicity

A form–meaning relationship may plausibly have participated in the historical creation or development of the word.

Type B: Emergent iconicity

A relationship may have become perceptible to speakers after the word already existed.

Type C: Coincidental resemblance

The apparent relationship may have no historical or cognitive significance.

Contemporary theories of iconicity explicitly allow for the possibility that motivated relationships can emerge or change over time rather than remaining fixed from the origin of a lexical item.

18. Falsifiability

A serious theory must specify what evidence would count against it.

The geometric-iconicity hypothesis would be weakened or rejected if:

geometric patterns disappear when independently coded;

phonetic patterns are no stronger than chance;

the patterns cannot be replicated across samples;

unrelated semantic categories show identical distributions;

historical evidence consistently contradicts the proposed correspondences;

researchers can reproduce the same apparent relationships using randomized data.

This is an essential feature of the proposal.

The purpose is not to demonstrate that every Albanian word contains a hidden geometric structure.

The purpose is to determine whether some systematic non-arbitrary structure exists and, if so, under what conditions.

19. Theoretical Implications

If significant relationships were eventually demonstrated, several theoretical consequences could follow.

First, the traditional opposition between arbitrariness and iconicity would become less adequate as a complete description of Albanian lexical structure.

Second, the relationship between language and bodily perception would deserve greater attention.

Third, written language could be reconsidered as a secondary representational system capable of preserving, reinforcing, or reinterpreting relationships that may originally have been phonetic or perceptual.

Fourth, Albanian could provide an additional language-specific testing ground for theories of sound symbolism and multimodal iconicity.

Importantly, this would not imply that Albanian is uniquely non-arbitrary.

Current research indicates that iconicity and arbitrariness can coexist in language and may perform different functions.

The contribution of Albanian would instead lie in providing a specific lexical and historical dataset through which these competing motivations can be investigated.

20. Discussion

The vesh case illustrates both the attraction and the danger of geometric analysis.

The attraction is clear.

The word refers to a perceptual organ whose anatomy contains openings, curves, folds, and channels. Its phonological form contains fricative consonants, including voiced /v/ and voiceless /ʃ/, while its orthographic representation contains visually distinctive forms such as V and S.

These facts create a striking multimodal configuration.

The danger, however, is equally clear.

Humans are highly capable of recognizing patterns. Once a possible correspondence has been proposed, it is easy to find additional similarities that support it while ignoring counterexamples.

For this reason, the theory cannot rely primarily on visual intuition.

The future of the hypothesis depends on formalization, replication, statistical testing, historical comparison, and falsifiability.

The strongest version of the hypothesis is therefore not:

“The word vesh comes from the geometric shape of the ear.”

Nor is it:

“The letter V represents the ear.”

The stronger scientific proposition is:

Certain lexical items in Albanian may exhibit statistically non-random correspondences among phonetic form, articulatory configuration, visual representation, perceptual properties, and semantic structure.

This proposition is sufficiently narrow to be testable and sufficiently broad to generate new research.

21. Conclusion

This article has proposed geometric iconicity as a working concept for investigating possible relationships among spatial form, bodily articulation, sound, perception, and lexical meaning.

The Albanian word vesh ‘ear’ provides a useful preliminary case because its referent is itself a perceptual organ and because its phonological and orthographic structures permit analysis at multiple levels.

The analysis does not establish that the modern letters  are the historical source of the word. Nor does it establish that the phoneme /v/ or /ʃ/ carries an intrinsic meaning of “ear.”

Instead, the case demonstrates how a lexical item can serve as a starting point for a broader research question:

Do systematic relationships exist among geometric configuration, articulation, acoustic structure, perception, and lexical meaning in Albanian?

Answering this question requires moving beyond individual examples toward a controlled corpus.

The proposed research program would therefore combine:

historical linguistics + phonetics + phonology + cognitive linguistics + semiotics + statistical analysis.

Such an interdisciplinary approach is consistent with the contemporary expansion of research on linguistic iconicity, which now examines motivated form–meaning relationships across spoken, written, and signed modalities.

The concept of geometric roots should consequently be regarded not as an established etymological theory, but as a research hypothesis.

Its value will ultimately depend not on how persuasive individual visual analogies appear, but on whether the proposed correspondences can survive systematic testing.

If they can, the findings could contribute to a broader understanding of how human beings transform perception into concept, concept into articulation, articulation into sound, and sound into language.

References

Barker, H., & Bozic, M. (2024). Forms, mechanisms, and roles of iconicity in spoken language: A review. Perceptual and Motor Skills.

Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615.

Nielsen, A. K. S., & Dingemanse, M. (2021). Iconicity in word learning and beyond: A critical review. Language and Speech.

Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225–252.

Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 227.

Sidhu, D. M. (2025). Sound symbolism in the lexicon: A review of iconic-systematicity. Language and Linguistics Compass, 19.

Winter, B., Woodin, G., & Perlman, M. (2023). 

Oxford Handbook of Iconicity in Language. (2026). Oxford University Press.