You need to step a little above and outside yourself, as if you were an external observer, and calmly analyze what you are saying or writing about the origin of language and etymology in particular. Ask yourself: does this actually make sense? Is it logical, or simply an emotional reaction of the moment? Very often, when you read your own thoughts from another perspective, you realize how weak, unclear, or even absurd they may sound. Many linguists and non-linguists alike write books, articles, blog posts, and social media posts about the origin of language. But the problem is that a large number of them never truly stop to reflect on what they are writing. They fail to examine their own thinking from a higher, more impartial, and more critical perspective. Instead, they remain trapped within their own one-sided viewpoint, taking for granted that whatever they believe must automatically be correct. This lack of critical distance makes their writing intellectually poor at its core, fill...
Within many Indo-European languages, the sound N is indeed one of the most stable and ancient markers of negation. The reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) language — the hypothetical ancestor of most European and several Asian languages — is believed to have used negative particles such as: ne = “not” nē = a more emphatic form of negation possibly prohibitive forms meaning “do not” From these ancient forms developed many of the negative words found across Indo-European languages: Language Negative Form Origin English no, not, none, never from PIE ne Latin ne, non from PIE French ne, non from Latin Italian non from Latin Spanish no from Latin German nein, nicht Germanic developments from PIE Russian ne, nyet Indo-European reflex Albanian nuk, s’ka, asnjë inherited and internally developed forms Sanskrit na highly archaic reflex Ancient Greek ne, ouk early Indo-European negation system Historically, then, the recurring presence of the sound N in negative words is not acciden...