Cham Albanian and the Root “di”
In the Cham Albanian dialect, the expression “u di” (standard “u gdhi”) means “it dawned / it became day.” This is not a poetic metaphor but an ordinary, living usage:
u di
→ impersonal, intransitive
→ literally: “it became known / it became visible”
→ semantically: light appeared; darkness ended
u gdhi
→ from gdhihem / gdhi, “to dawn; to wake into daylight”
→ more concrete, but semantically equivalent
The decisive point—systematically ignored in Greek-centric etymology—is that di here does not mean “to know” in a modern cognitive sense. It preserves an archaic semantic identity:
di = to see = to become visible
light → visibility → consciousness
This is not speculative reconstruction; it is direct linguistic evidence, still functioning in a living Balkan language. Cham Albanian exposes the pre-abstract layer from which later philosophical meanings were derived—and subsequently obscured.
The Root “di” and the Semantic Mechanics of αἰδώς
The key to understanding αἰδώς lies not in speculative Proto-Indo-European roots, but in a living semantic structure preserved in Albanian. At its core is the symbolic-semantic root “di”, which underlies knowing, day, god, and sun. Albanian alone preserves this root transparently:
di – “to know”
di – “to dawn”
dit(ë) – “day”
diell – “sun”
drit(ë) – “light”
ndiej – “to feel, to sense”
The unifying principle is clear: “di” = visibility, illumination, awareness. Albanian encodes the cognitive and perceptual foundation of human experience, where light, vision, and knowledge are inseparable.
Greek and Latin, by contrast, abstracted away this structure. Latin dio (“god”) and Greek notions of light, knowledge, or divinity are reconstructable only through speculative etymology. Albanian preserves the living mechanics: the interplay between visibility and cognition, exposure and concealment, desire and avoidance.
The Albanian Verb ndiej and the Perceptual Continuum of di
The Albanian verb ndiej (“to feel, to sense”) derives from Proto-Albanian *n-di-e- / (a)n-di-e-, an extension of di, encoding perception and awareness. It extends the semantic axis of di from external visibility to internal sensation. What is first seen and known becomes felt. Albanian thus preserves a complete perceptual continuum rather than isolated abstractions.
Morphological and Semantic Development:
Root: di (Proto-Albanian) – perception, visibility, awareness
Extension: (a)n-di-e- → ndiej
Core meaning: “to feel, to sense, to experience internally”
Related forms:
ndjenjë (noun) – “feeling; emotion”
ndihem (reflexive) – “to feel oneself; to feel well/unwell”
These forms demonstrate that feeling and emotion in Albanian are grounded in perception, not treated as abstract, autonomous phenomena.
Indo-European Context:
Formations related to ndiej (including ndjerë) point to older relational and locative elements associated with proximity and presence, plausibly connected with PIE me (“with”). Parallels exist with Greek μέχρι (mékhri) and Old Armenian merj, though these connections are structural and typological rather than strictly derivational.
Greek αἰδώς and the Collapse of the PIE Explanation
Greek αἰδώς (aidos) denotes an unstable semantic field: shame, reverence, respect, modesty, fear before others. Beekes labels it etymologically uncertain, citing PIE h₂eysd- (“to praise, to honour”).
This fails on two counts:
Formally: A root h₂eysd- should yield αἰζώς, which does not exist—a structural mismatch, not a minor irregularity.
Semantically: “Praise” and “honour” cannot account for shame, fear of exposure, withdrawal. These are central to αἰδώς. The PIE abstraction cannot explain the duality.
Greek etymology names the problem; it does not explain it.
The Semantic Structure Albanian Preserves
Albanian preserves the vertical semantic machinery that Greek has fossilized:
Shame = withdrawal from visibility (adi-)
Honour = desire toward the other (ai + do)
Feeling = internal experience (ndiej)
This semantic system forms a continuous perceptual-cognitive axis:
light → visibility → knowledge → feeling → social affect
Greek retains the noun αἰδώς but loses the internal mechanics.
Semantic Axis Diagram: Albanian vs. Beekes’ PIE Model
ALBANIAN (Vertical Axis)
SUN / LIGHT
| diell, dritë
VISIBILITY
| di, u di / u gdhi
KNOWLEDGE
| di
FEELING / INTERNAL EXPERIENCE
| ndiej, ndjenjë
SOCIAL–AFFECTIVE STATES
| Honour / Respect → movement toward other
| Shame → withdrawal from visibility
GREEK αἰδώς
(compressed semantic fossil)
BEEKES / PIE RECONSTRUCTION (Horizontal Axis)
*h₂eysd- → αἰδώς*
(abstract root; no mechanism for shame / visibility / feeling; semantic compression prior to Greek attestation; monolithic unit)
Key Contrast:
Albanian. Beekes / PIE
Structure
Vertical axis: light → visibility → knowledge → feeling → social affect
Horizontal root: abstract h₂eysd- → honour
Transparency
Fully visible semantic mechanics
Compressed, opaque; no internal explanation
Scope
Cognitive + perceptual + affective + social
Only abstract “honour”; shame unexplained
Evidence
Living language, morphologically preserved
Hypothetical root, attested only in Greek
Greek names the paradox. Albanian preserves the mechanism.
Conclusion: The Cost of Ignoring Albanian
Beekes is right to doubt the formal validity of h₂eysd-. Stopping there is methodological timidity. Albanian demonstrates the archaeology of meaning: it preserves opposed experiential states neutralized in Greek.
Greek offers polished abstractions; Albanian shows the working parts: the vertical, living semantic architecture linking light → visibility → knowledge → feeling → social action. Ignoring Albanian does not make Greek etymology safer—it makes it incomplete.
Comments
Post a Comment