Skip to main content

The Embryomorphic Elements of Language: A New Perspective on Etymology

The Etymology of Language Construction: A Critical Perspective
The etymologies provided by modern linguists often fail to capture the essence of language construction. This limitation is evident when examining the word for "mouth" across various languages.
According to traditional etymology, the word of the ancient Greek "stóma," derived from Proto-Indo-European "*stomn̥" or "*stomen-" ("mouth, muzzle"). However, the Albanian language reveals a more fundamental code underlying word construction.

In Albanian, the word for "mouth" is "goj(ë)" in the standard language, "golë" in the Cham dialect, and "gjoj" in the Geg dialect of the Mat region. 
A closer examination of these words exposes a deeper structural explanation: Gjë-O = gojë/gol(ë), which translates to "O thing." This pattern is consistent across various languages, where "gjë O" corresponds to "mouth" (English), "bocca" (Italian), and "рот" (Russian).

The Albanian language boasts numerous O-words that reflect the physical O-shape of the objects they describe. These words demonstrate that newer languages have been constructed upon the code-words of the ancient Albanian language. This intentional design change occurred relatively late in the evolution of the European languages.

Older languages like Albanian have contributed fundamental building blocks or "helper cells" to the vocabularies of newer languages. The connection between the pictogram "O" and the mouth has its roots in ancient pictographic writing systems.
Ancient Pictograms and the Origin of the "O" Symbol
A closer examination of ancient pictograms reveals the following:

1. In the script now called Danubian (or Vinča), the ancient script of the Albanian language, the symbol for "mouth" was a circular O shape.
2. In ancient Sumerian cuneiform, the symbol for "mouth" was a circular or oval shape, similar to the modern letter "O."
3. In ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, the symbol for "mouth" was also a circular or oval shape.
Examples such as "gj"ë O", "ba-O-ka," "si-t-O-ma," "R-O-T," and "me-O-TH" illustrate how these embryomorphic elements of Albanian are incorporated into words, often featuring the shape or sound "O" as a recurring element.

The Chinese character for "mouth" is indeed (kǒu), which is a rectangle with an open top, symbolizing an open mouth. The presence of the "O" sound in the middle of the character is intriguing, especially considering the potential phonetic change between Albanian and Chinese.

The g>k phonetic change is a common sound shift in linguistics, where the sound "g" shifts to "k" in certain languages or dialects. This sound change is observed in various language families, including Indo-European and Sino-Tibetan.
Given the similarities between the Albanian and Chinese words for "mouth," it's possible that there's a deeper connection between the two languages, potentially reflecting an ancient linguistic or cultural exchange.

Conclusion
The etymologies of modern linguists often overlook the fundamental codes underlying language construction. The Albanian language, with its unique O-words and ancient pictographic roots, offers a fascinating glimpse into the intentional design of language. By examining the embryomorphic elements and pictographic symbols that underlie language construction, we can gain a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics of human communication.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nephilim

N 'eh - Ph 'ih- L 'ee- M /  Nepheeleem Zacharia Sitchin (July 11, 1920 – October 9, 2010)  wrote the " Nephilim " (נְפִילִים) is derived from “nafàl" and means “fall". The term Nephilim occurs in Genesis 6:1-4, describing the point of time when three things began: men began to increase in number, came into existence the daughters of men , and the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. Is the "nephillim" really only a Hebrew word? That question is very subtle, however I think it has been more a limit of thinking for linguists rather than a serious argument. Let's begin first with the probable meaning the linguists think it is. We know that the " fall"  in every language means moving downward from a higher position involuntarily, usually by an accident, which maybe was the reason why Michael S. Heiser, PhD candidate, Department of Hebrew and Semitic Studies , University of Wisconsin...

Word creation. The "D" letter origin and the "D" pictogram rule of the word creation.

  In this article I will cover  the origin of the letter  D letter, and the pictogram concept of the word creation.  It was my first discovery of the word creation. In this blog I will give my discoveries, the rules of word creation of the European languages. Multiple theories exist as to how language first originated. Nobody is sure which one is true. Certified Translations Get Pricing Order Translation What is the Oldest Language in the World? There are over 7,000 languages in the world. Could there have been a time on the earth that we all spoke one language? If so, what is the oldest language in the world?  So what was the first language?  Discovering the first language that people spoke is difficult because so many languages died and were considered lost in history. However, ancient languages still survive until today; these languages may have been transformed a lot but their old origins may be traceable. Written languages existed but this does n...

Total positional tolerance at material condition

Total positional tolerance at material condition (Hole) Suppose the Ø 1.005 / 1.010 hole is inspected and there are six parts with different ID dimensions. Their actual sizes checked with run out methods give that their actual axis is to be .006” over and up from the true position even though they have different actual ID’s. We want to know which part is within true position tolerance at MMC. Parts to be acceptable require some calculation when is used the run out method.             In GD&T, maximum material condition (MMC) refers to a hole that contains the greatest amount of material.             To understand and memorize simply and logically the concept, I suppose that you have a part designed as a square with one hole in the center, Ø 1.005 / 1.010 . You have produced just 5 parts and measured their holes. The hole of part #1 is on the low side of its tolerance Ø 1.005" and the hole of part #5 is on high sid...