The Etymology of the Albanian word gjallë

Let's continue with the Albanian codes. The code of the gjallë / alive, living word of the Albanian language.

It is said that life is a journey in this world, where we are temporary transients, the only system capable of maintaining a constant level of uninterrupted movement within itself.

It is likely that the word alive comes from the word move a simple, permanent quality of a human body. A quality that unites a whole class of living beings, which includes a harmonious cycle of plants, trees and animals. All living things in one movement

A movement that means growth, the will to be present somewhere with someone, the ability to move continuously; The movement passes into an unstoppable force that changes and never ends, always striking like waves on a rock, like a raging river after autumn rains.

It is said that life ends with death, but there is only one law of life - movement, which remains its ineffable mystery that we often forget and to which we owe miracles and respect, union and understanding of the living touched in every form.

*gjallë

From Proto-Albanian *ģalu̯a-, *salwa, from Proto-Indo-European *solh₂wós, from *solh₂- (“all”); cognate to Latin salvus, Greek ολος (ólos).[1]

i gjallë m (feminine e gjallë, masculine plural të gjallë)

1. alive, living

Schumacher, Stefan; Matzinger, Joachim (2013) Die Verben des Altalbanischen: Belegwörterbuch, Vorgeschichte und Etymologie (Albanische Forschungen; 33) (in German), Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, →ISBN, page 212

Etymology
Galua=
Ga lua=
Ka lua=
Qe lua=
Qe lu-a/tha moves
Gje lu/ke lu/qe lu
"A *lu thing", "has *lu", "that *lu" wherever you turn the word, it comes from the Albanian language roots.
The base of the word *Galua is *lu=move a form still in use in Geg, and the the code of L.

*Gjallë comes from the Albanian language itself and its content reveals and explains the Latin words *salvus and Greek *olos. *Salvus and *olos are derivatives of *galua.

Organic things that do not move are no longer alive, in life. That is the fundamental difference between the two groups from the linguistic word formation point of view of our ancestors.