Why 'Nephilim' means in the beginning?

Linguists that were and are trying to find out the origin of words have always been under the pressure of the confusion of their relative appearance, and mostly are being tricked by the actual performance meanings they have, which in fact are what we got at the end of the cycle. Linguists always belittle the study of their meanings which is really the primary thing that they are connected, and the relation between words and symbols what they stand for. Linguists haven’t seen other dimensions of the concept itself the words represent and the relationship between words and concepts. According to their views, started by Ferdinand de Saussure, who only demonstrated at his time the ignorance of linguistics, it is not very different from today views, after a century of how mistaken linguists views are, except Joseph Greenberg's and Derek Bickerton's views , there are mostly no connections between words and symbols what they stand for. A wrong orientation is going to create other wrong conceptions about the origin of language.
How to group the words and as a consequence the languages, how to compare them, how to determine the main element which serves as a base to build another subgroup, and how every element of the subgroup builds another sub-subgroup? How the subgroups of a language deviate into new languages?

According to the traditional view, a language contains thousands of different words among which there are no connections. Are there connections between different language units? Are there genetic connections among a group a words inside a language itself?
First of all, all words are created from five sources:

1. Sound (symbolism)
2. Picture.
3. Sound-picture combination.
4. Idea.
5. Sound-picture-idea combination.

Two are main rules:
1. Cannot be compared words that are created from different sources. They could be very similar, but, however their meaning is completely different because the sources are different.

2. Similar words that have the same meaning, or they make part at the same subgroup meaning they are related as for a language itself, so for different languages. If two very different languages have in common only a word for the same meaning or subgroup meaning, that means that they are related. It is not a coincidence. Two identical parameters, the word and its meaning could not be a coincidence.

Most of the dictionaries determine the beginning concept as:

1. The first point something begins.
2. The first part of something: The start of a period of time, an event, a process.
3. Origin.
4. Early period.

In the way the dictionaries are structured , on the surface way it could be just about anything that starts, when it is written down like ‘first part of something’, all billions of cases could be told. There are more, in fact, which are not written because no room in a dictionary, or they are not yet discovered, or there are not still all relationships between words and concepts understood.
WORDS FAMILY

WORDS FAMILY

What the dictionaries do not explain: All words that have a beginning meaning, such as begin, beginning, one, first, kid, seedling, tiny, etc, are connected into one .There is only one concept which profoundly contains all meanings for all those words, which sounds a little like the opposite direction of modern dictionary explanations, or the linguistic theories about this subject.What is in all words is in it, and what is in it is in all words. This concept I am going to call the 'I' primary symbol.

The primary word itself came from the 'I' idea-symbol. It came from a mathematical concept. It is a number. It is the concept of the number one; translated with modern terms as the "first"; the first as a number, noun, adverb, pronoun, etc. The number one is at the beginning of everything, first part of something: first time, first time of an event, origin, age, early period, etc.

Thus, the 'I' was the primary concept, on which are based a group of words. That’s why the Albanian word for the number one is "nji”, in the oldest dialect of Albanian, which phonetically is a 'nii', which means "ne i" ‘in the [I]’.The Albanian letter “j” is the letter which has the “y” sound (like English "yield"); It came from a long “i” sound, and presented in the Latin alphabet as an extension of a "I" letter into "J" symbol, for preservation of the correct pronunciation of the "i' sound (English “ee” sound). The same thing happened in Hebrew indicated by the arrow, the Hebrew consonant yod.



Michael S. Heiser writes: " ...the letter yod (y), which has two functions: (1) the “y” sound; (2) to mark the long “i” sound (as in “ee”, like in English “machine”). In the case of nephilim (notice the English spelling with two “i” vowels), the yod serves to give us the long “i” vowel sound. Hence nephilim is technically (correctly) pronounced "nepheeleem" .” (http://www.michaelsheiser.com/nephilim.pdf)

How is possible that the yod—acts like a "i" and the "j" letter of Latin, and j-sound of Albanian?
The primary is still alive as a letter "i", as a word for the number one and as an 'I' sound only in the Albanian language. This fact is supported from other evidence, from Latin, in the Roman numerals. The numbers 1 to 10 can be expressed in Roman numerals as follows: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X, except no sound in 'I' because Roman numerals were originally independent symbols. The Roman numeral 'I' descends not from the letter 'I' but from a notch scored across the stick.

Albanian evidence can give an explanation about Etruscan language because the Etruscans used I, Λ, X, ⋔, 8, ⊕, for I, V, X, L, C, and M, of which only I and X happened to be letters in their alphabet.

There is also another interesting fact that in Chinese exists the same identical character for the number one, and having the same semivowel 'y' and the vowel 'ee' so as the "ji" 'yee' of the Albanian language. Is it a coincidence like most of linguists would say? Or, the coincidence is an argument of imitating mechanically without understanding what some linguists before them said.

TAB 1 I's Words Family

	Albanian
		Chinese	English	Italian	Latin
One= “I” symbol “ee”-sound	nji 'nyee' një, nje,             一yī 'yee' nja                                                 nja		one	uno	unum
I	Unë, Una, U	我Wǒ	I (my)	Io (mio,mia)	Io
my	im, imja	我的Wǒ de	my, mine	mio, mia; +il,la	mea,mei, hic
we	Ne	我們 Wǒmen	We	Noi	Nos
our	jon, yn,ton,son	我們的 Womende	our	Nostro, nostra	Nostrum (Hic)
begin	filloj, nis	開始káishί	begin	iniziare	incipiunt
beginning	fillim	開始 káishί	Beginning	inizio	incipiens
kid, child,boy	fimia, fëmia, bir( a male child), bij (a female child)	孩子 háizi	kid,child,boy	Figlio, bambino	filius
seedling	filiz	幼苗Yòumiáo	Seedling	piantina	germen
rise, arise	lind,  ngrihem	出現Chūxiàn	Rise. arise	sorgere	surge
give birth	lind	分娩Fēnmiǎn	give birth	nascere	enisus, enixus
unity, to unite	Njësi, njëhsoj	統一Tǒngyī	unity, to unite	unitá, di unire	unitate
similar (si ‘eye'); even	Njisoj,  njësoj	Lèisì	similar	similare	similis
tiny	çik	小 Xiǎo	tiny	picolo	parvus
little	çik,	小 Xiǎo	little	poco	parum
minor	i mitur	小 Xiǎo,	minor	minore	pupilla
thin, petit	i imët	嬌小 Jiāoxiǎo	thin, petit	Sottile, fine	tenues
junior	i ri,	初級 Chūjí	junior	giovane, junior	junior
whole	gjithë	一yī ’yee’	whole	tutto	totum
single	i vetëm	單一 Dānyī	single	singolo	una
a, an,	një, nji	一yi ’yee’	a, an,	uno
once	nji here, një herë	一yi ’yee’	once	una volta	semel
each (any,every)	sejcili	一yi ’yee’	each	ogni	singulis
time	kohe	時間 Shíjiān	time	tempo	tempus
every time	gjithnjë, gjithnji	一yi ’yee’	every time	ogni volta	omni tempore
now	tani, ime	現在 Xiànzài	now	ora	nunc
throughout	Gjatë gjithë	一yi ’yee’	throughout	In tutto	per
birth	lindje	分娩Fēnmiǎn	birth	nascita, stirpe	natus
origin, genesis,	origjin  zanafill	創世紀Chuàng shìjì	genesis origin	genesi origine	genesi originem