Is the history of the Roman Empire's existence and greatness manipulated? Was the Roman Empire truly Roman? How could a country without fertile fields, mineral resources, or a dense population at that time have created such an empire, as described in the books preserved by powerful churches?
Could the Roman Empire's identity be hidden behind that of the Illyrians-Albanians, a people who possessed thousands of hectares of fertile land, knew metal smelting, and more? What facts cast doubt on the history presented in European church books?The discovery of a 7,000-year-old road on the Croatian coast, predating the Roman Empire, raises questions. Who built the structures near Korčula Island in Croatia? Archaeologists were astonished by the 7,000-year-old road found underwater in the Mediterranean.
The extensive network of paved roads attributed to Ancient Rome might not be Roman. Could these roads belong to the Illyrian Empire, erased from history by church books? Which ancient people inhabited present-day Croatia, and how did they build roads thousands of years before the Roman Empire?
The road in Croatia is approximately 13 meters wide, comparable to modern roads. Dating back to around 5,000 BC, it makes this road one of the oldest known stone roads on Earth. Archaeologist Mate Parica stated that the settlement dates back to around 4,900 BC.
Artificial islands and ancient structures suggest a sophisticated civilization. Yet, archaeologists and linguists often don't explore the builders' identities or DNA. In contrast, DNA analysis in England has linked skeletons to local populations. Why haven't similar analyses been conducted on pre-Illyrian-Albanian populations?
Furthermore, the discovery of some of the oldest known writings on Earth in settlements associated with pre-Illyrian-Albanian populations raises additional questions about the origins and contributions of these ancient civilizations, suggesting a potentially significant role in the development of written communication.
Rome's geography doesn't support the idea of it being the cradle of civilizations. The logical conclusion based on available information is that European history, preserved and transmitted by churches, is challenging to verify due to the lack of original texts.
Scientifically, with texts being copies of copies, and no originals existing, it's difficult to verify accuracy. This raises questions about the validity of the history presented in church books, potentially deceiving scholars across Europe.
Scientifically, with texts being copies of copies, and no originals existing, it's difficult to verify accuracy. This raises questions about the validity of the history presented in church books, potentially deceiving scholars across Europe.
https://youtu.be/LT6fN-hRyeg?si=tnbAtsFedFO5NbQk
Comments
Post a Comment