Skip to main content

Posts

US Citizenship Naturalization Test 2014

The test consists of two parts: the civics test and the English language test. I. The Civics Test (Illinois) The civics test is an oral test. The USCIS officer will read the questions and the applicant must answer verbally. In the civics test, applicants must answer correctly 6 out of 10 questions on American history and civics. The 10 question are randomly selected from the list of 100 questions. Some questions require only one answer but there are more than one(1) correct answer. The applicant needs to know only one (1) choice if in the question is required only one answer, but if the question asks for more than one(1) answer the applicant needs to answer according to what the question requires. If the applicant answers the first six(6) questions correctly, the applicant is finished with the civic test. Applicants are given two chances to take the civics tests. Applicants who fail the test during their first interview will be retested within from 60 to 90 days. The appl

E TAN E EPI TAN

E TAN E EPI TAN Ata shkruajnë se "e tan e epi tan" do të thotë "Me këtë, ose mbi këtë". Kjo frazë ishte një fjali nga nënat spartane drejtuar bijve të tyre kur shkonim në betejë, dhe thirrje kur luftonin spartanët, të cilën sot studiuesit historiko-gjuhësorë e përkthejnë gabim, që unë e quaj propagandë politike gjuhësore greko-romake, ose mosnjohje e gjuhës së parë. Spartanët, ose në shqipen e sotme mendoj qe do të thotë "shpatarë", mendoj qe kane folur Shqipen e parë. Kuptimi i saktë i kësaj shprehjeje është: 1) E TAN = te tan ne gegenisht, të tërë, të gjithë bashke ne Shqipen standarde 2) E EPI=jepi 3) TAN = te tan ne gegenisht, të tërë, të gjithë bashke ne Shqipen standarde. Pra kuptimi i kësaj shprehjeje është: "Të gjithë së bashku, jepi, të gjithë bashkë." Dhe në fund të mburojës shkruhet Imprimis, që sërish është shqipja e parë. Në shqipen e sotme ka përfunduar: 1) im=im 2) primis=prijes.

Proprieties attributed to God.

Linguistic proprieties attributed to God. Are linguistic proprieties attributed to God tight with a set of logical elements of words-concepts? Do the words-concepts for God fit together linguistically? Linguistic God attributes should exist together in harmonious, in a stable system of the linguistic elements which are based on the human needs, fears, feelings, and knowledge at the time of their formation. God Words concepts did not come out in a day or suddenly. Before the creation of the God’s name there were too many Gods, proper names. They were related with specific elements of the nature such as the water, sky, fire, which are simple to be explained linguistically. The God word is more complicated because it is an abstract word. Did God word-concept come into existence gradually from a generalization of all attributes of primary concrete gods? In Albanian language is so clear that God name is a title name. Albanian is the only language that one of the words for G
How words are contained in human minds in the beginning of language creation. I suppose the word for eye is the first word created by humans. Other word was not created. Was there a mental image for the real thing eye before the first word was created or a mental definition? It is the same question we ask today for the animals. Do animals have mental images of the actual thing of the world? If we experiment now with ourselves saying “eye” what will happen in our mind? Do you see any eye image after you thought, or said the word “eye”? I did it, and no eye image passed in my mind, but I cannot conclude it was the same for the first word. I think, for the first word there was not created a mental definition in human brain. In the first word in the human mind the image of an eye, which existed before as it exists in animals was recorded in a brain cell  in full awareness for the first time . That moment human brain broke the border of the animal brain taking awareness to the images it

How are words made?

All our knowledge about how words are made is almost zero. We know only how words sound when we say them and how words look when we write them, nothing else, nothing more. Let’s look more closely at one word you have already read on my previous articles. It is the word for the eye. How words are contained in human minds in the beginning of the language creation? I suppose the word for eye is one the first words created by humans. How did it happen? Was it just a mental image for the real thing eye before the word "eye" was created or a mental definition? It is very similar to the question we ask in our modern time for the "language" of animals. Do animals have in their brains the mental images of the actual things of the world? If we experiment now with ourselves saying “eye” what will happen in our mind? Do you see any eye image after you thought, or said the word “eye”? I did it, and no eye image came in my mind, but I cannot conclude it was the same for th
Ulliri eshte 0,po keshtu dhe gropa, tuneli,vrime,etj. Ata nuk kane asnje te petbashket si fjale por kane te perbashket kodin si ndertim.

Albanian enjoy-gëzoj etymology and semantics

A ka të bëjë njësia gjuhësore *gëzoj me njësinë "zërin", "zanin"? Apo ndoshta ka të bëjë me "zanien" e grurit, apo “zanien” në gjueti, apo të një diçkaje të rëndësishme mbijetuese për tu ushqyer? Apo ndoshta të dyja bashkë njëkohësisht dhe kemi përplasjet e madhe shumëkuptimore të “zë”-së së Shqipes, edhe *zë-(sound), edhe *zë 'kap', edhe *zë 'bëhet'? Njëra është qëllimi i arritur , tjetra është mënyra e shprehjes zanore njerëzore kur njeriu gëzon? A duhet të ketë shkue *gëzon deri tek "zanda", ose *canta e sotme Italiane, dhe "kanga" e Shqipes? A janë kopje të njëra tjetrës , apo ndoshta janë ndërtime semantike që prej kohes kur Latinishtja nuk ekzistonte. Të gjitha supozimet e mesiperme janë të mundshme . Më duhet të them edhe njëhere në njësitë kaq të thella abstrakte si "gëzoj" duhet kërkim më i thellë dhe vetëm për këtë njësi dhe familjen e saj semantike, pemen e thelbeve kuptimore ndërtuese.